Skip to content
Call Now To Schedule An Asset Protection Analysis: (800) 231-7112

Compared to the FLP, the LLC is the relative newcomer to the field. LLC’s began in the 1970’s in Wyoming and Florida. They create a corporate structure, and give the benefits of a corporation without the downside of double taxation. Prior to the LLC this was accomplished by using an S-Corporation; however, S-Corps have significant restrictions and are therefore difficult to use. With the introduction of the LLC came a true hybrid with essentially all of the benefits of the Corporation and none of the S-Corp restrictions or double taxation downside.

The LLC has the exact same tax options as the FLP. The LLC does not use the term shareholders, but rather “members.” In the standard LLC structure there is only one class of member. This was meant to mirror the corporate stock ownership and creates a majority rule type of management. While this can be changed through careful drafting, it is this distinction that becomes important when comparing it to the Limited Partnership for use in Asset Protection Planning.

There is much confusion today about which structure is most desirable when it comes to the area of Asset Protection. While both are useful, their differences should not be overlooked. In particular, there is a distinct advantage to the Limited Partnership structure when it comes to designing a truly effective Asset Protection Plan. For example under the laws of Arizona, a model state and considered one of the very best jurisdictions for the purpose of Asset Protection, there are the following critical differences between an FLP and an LLC:

  1. An FLP requires “unanimous consent” for dissolution as opposed to a majority in interest (51%) for an LLC. This restriction is advantageous in both a creditor situation and a discount valuation scenario.
  2. It is much easier to obtain “Administrative Dissolution” in an LLC. This is a significant disadvantage with respect to Asset Protection. Among the grounds for administrative dissolution in an LLC are:
    1. Failure to make required amendments to the articles of organization,
    2. Failure to make required publication,
    3. No statutory agent or registered office for a period of 60 days and
    4. Failure to notify the corporation commission of a change in statutory agent or registered office within 60 days.
  3. While these seem minor, they are often overlooked and may be used by a judge to justify dissolving an LLC. There is no corresponding statute for an FLP, which is much more likely to remain intact in a creditor crisis.

  4. A majority of LLC members can require a distribution in an LLC.
  5. There is no right to distribution in an FLP until winding up.
  6. An FLP can allocate income, gain, loss, deductions or credit items in any manner it deems appropriate. This is not the case for an LLC.

For all of the above reasons, when it comes to structuring the most effective Asset Protection Plan possible, the use of an FLP as the primary consolidating entity is preferable. This is particularly true if the planning combines the use of an Asset Protection Trust. Since the APT would typically hold a majority of the FLP interest, using a Limited Partnership share is ideal as opposed to attempting to draft around the LLC rules with a membership interest.

The LLC is, nevertheless, extremely useful. Most often an LLC will be used to hold and shield individual “risky” assets such as real estate, boats, airplanes, and other potentially liability generating assets. These may be held by a multi or single member LLC, which in turn may be held by the master FLP. The clients may directly hold the General Partnership interest of the FLP with the APT serving as the majority Limited Partner. The net effect is that the majority of the client’s assets would be ultimately held in the FLP with the wrap around protection of the APT.

This structure is the ultimate in ease of use, protection and lawsuit deterrence, while maintaining the level of comfort and control most clients require. The mere existence of this level of planning is often enough of a deterrent to dissuaded potential plaintiffs’ and their aggressive attorneys.

One of The Nation's Leading Asset Protection Attorneys

This Post Has One Comment

  1. this makes it a little clearer. If there is only one entity (myself) in either the LLC or the FLP, does that lesson the advantage of the FLP? (as per number 1 above)
    as for number 2 above, would you say that an LLC rquires more “paperwork ” and filing to keep it going?
    And as for number 5, this seems like a very usefull distinction, as far as “liquidity”. Would that be an accurate assessment?
    thanks so much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pashmina Lalchandani

CEO & Co-Founder, Bar & Cocoa / Owner, Flow Simple
December 9, 2010, Douglass was a client of Pashmina’s

I’ve known Doug in many contexts, as a friend, as a client and as a business partner and he impresses me on all levels. He’s dependable, smart, generous and I wouldn’t hesitate recommending him and his law firm to anyone.
He’s the best and most ethical lawyers providing asset protection with rock solid strategies to give you peace of mind about your wealth. Straight forward, and straight talk. Doug is exactly the lawyer I want on my side. If I send someone to Doug, I know they’ll thank me for it!

Social & Solar Entrepreneur, Pan Afrikan Theorist, Translator/Interpreter,
Founder & Visionary Leader @ Afrikanpride.
March 12, 2011, Marlon E. D. J. worked with Douglass but at different companies

Doug is one of the most powerful thinker i have came across. During the short time that i have known Doug he has been a great source of inspiration. He has a simplistic yet effective and accurate way to analyze anything you bring to his attention, and then by asking you key questions he gets you to see the light at the end of the tunnel. Besides being extremely bright, he is a genuine and caring individual which is why I feel fortunate to know him. I can say without a doubt that he his the person you would want to talk to if you were in need of a person with his expertise.
Most of the lawyers out there will probably meet your needs, but if you are looking for someone to exceed your expectations and give you that wow factor, look no more he is the person for the job.

Patricia Salter

Associate Dentist at Smileology
December 1, 2010, Patricia was a client of Douglass’

I have been a client of Douglas Lodmell’s since 2001. My main concern was asset protection in this litigious society. I can sleep alot better at night knowing I have the instruments in place to protect the fruits of my labor, and that they will not end up in the hands of a slick trial attorney.

Corporate Transparency Act

Stay compliant with the Corporate Transparency Act.
Report your business entities easily through FinCEN’s streamlined process.

Contact Us Today to Schedule an Asset Protection Analysis.

800-231-7112

Back To Top